Morrison endures the witness field

Former Prime Minister, Scott Morrison

As senior minister at its inception, Morrison may be characterised (pretty or not) as the daddy of Robodebt, writes MICHELLE GRATTAN.

SCOTT Morrison will without end be often called “the bulldozer”, and he lived as much as his self-description on the Robodebt royal fee this week.

Michelle Grattan.

It was classic Morrison, verbally lumbering about, up and down aspect streets of various relevance, as he gave proof on a scandal that concerned appalling therapy of individuals wrongfully pursued within the identify of the “integrity” of the welfare system.

What the inquiry is exposing is the extent of the integrity failure throughout the former authorities and the federal public service.

As senior minister at its inception, Morrison may be characterised (pretty or not) as the daddy of Robodebt: it was developed by the division of human providers along with enter from his division whereas he was within the social providers portfolio. Somebody who noticed himself as a tricky “cop” on the welfare block, the plan, labored up within the paperwork, naturally appealed to him.

The large problem at Wednesday’s listening to was whether or not he was suggested that laws was wanted for the scheme to be authorized. Morrison stated he wasn’t.

He maintained that, whereas an early govt minute referred to laws, the ultimate departmental submission didn’t point out that may be required. A field asking whether or not the proposal would want legislative change was ticked “no”.

Pressed on why he didn’t pursue the matter, Morrison stated he’d assumed the division had completed its work. In the long run, in fact, the scheme was discovered unlawful and the federal government needed to repay an enormous quantity.

It was much less the content material of Wednesday’s proof that was outstanding than the type of its supply. Royal Commissioner Catherine Holmes reprimanded Morrison a number of occasions for rambling moderately than merely answering what he was being requested.

At one level, moderately within the method of a college instructor, she requested him sharply if he was listening. At one other, she stated: “I do perceive that you simply come from a background the place rhetoric is essential however it’s essential to hearken to the query.”

See also  $3 billion for ‘focused and momentary’ reduction on payments

Senior counsel aiding the fee, Justin Greggery, repeatedly known as Morrison again on monitor, telling him ten minutes had been wasted in a single diversion.

Painful to observe, Morrison’s efficiency was one other reminder of how out of contact together with his environment he could be, which was a serious cause he flopped as PM.

Whereas Morrison was having one more unhealthy week, his successor, Anthony Albanese, was having fun with his newest win, with the federal government’s vitality package deal passing parliament, which had been recalled on Thursday to take care of it.

The laws caps the fuel value for 12 months, provides the federal government long-term authority to impose a “affordable” value on fuel, and supplies a subsidy for the payments of some family and enterprise customers (with element to be labored out over summer time). This aid will price the federal authorities $1.5 billion, matched by the states.

The laws was all the time going to get via. The federal government is lucky in having a compliant Senate, and the vitality story gave an perception into the way it operates.

The federal government wants the Greens plus another vote to hold contested laws. This majority will virtually all the time be there; equally, there’ll often be minor energy play alongside the best way.

On the vitality invoice, the Greens have obtained a promise of measures within the price range to assist households and companies electrify. Particulars later.

It was a gesture from the federal government however the Greens additionally had nowhere else to go if Labor had wished to withstand. Working into Christmas there was no approach they have been going to carry this up.

In any occasion, potential federal compensation for coal producers, if the manufacturing price is above the coal cap the states are set to impose, is just not contained on this laws – and that compensation is the Greens’ major objection.

See also  Morrison 'wasn't as much as the job', says writer

There’s an fascinating dynamic in relation to Senate ACT impartial David Pocock on the one hand, and Tasmanian crossbencher Jacqui Lambie (who now has a second senator, Tammy Tyrrell, in her Jacqui Lambie Community) on the opposite.

Pocock, new this time period, has been high-profile and receives in depth media consideration. The federal government relied on his vote to get its industrial relations laws via, and he shall be Labor’s pure go-to particular person.
On IR, the federal government gave some concessions to clinch a take care of Pocock, together with agreeing to a brand new physique that can evaluation social safety funds earlier than every price range and supply suggestions.

Lambie, who was typically within the information throughout the Morrison years, has been put considerably within the shade by the arrival of Pocock and the configuration of the brand new Senate. It’s not a place she’s used to. So it was unsurprising this week that Lambie was out of the blocks early, supporting the vitality laws. That meant Pocock’s vote wasn’t wanted.

Jostling among the many Senate crossbenchers – maybe Pauline Hanson will deal One Nation into the play in some unspecified time in the future – is one thing we’re prone to see within the months forward. Crossbenchers want to have the ability to say to their voters they’ve the flexibility to “ship”.

The vitality package deal is the second main piece of laws (the opposite was the IR invoice) on which the federal government has clashed with enterprise pursuits.

Enterprise teams complained that the widening of multi-employer bargaining within the IR laws would result in extra strikes. The federal government responded that its precedence (and election dedication) was to get wages shifting.

The dealing with of that laws advised enterprise one thing it might need anticipated. Regardless of Albanese insisting he and the enterprise neighborhood have a very good relationship, when the crunch comes, the federal government received’t shrink back from a struggle with it.

See also  Why no native jail numbers, Dr Leigh?

The vitality package deal has drawn protests and threats from some useful resource firms, with claims the federal government’s interventionist strategy will deter funding.

Time will inform whether or not that is simply scorching air. Clearly the federal government judged it had little alternative however to do one thing, given the huge will increase homeowners and enterprises are going through of their payments.

Regardless of the longer-term fallout, the federal government is aware of whose aspect the general public shall be on – and it received’t be that of the useful resource firms. And inside enterprise, producers are glad at something that restrains the magnitude of the worth hikes.

Trade Minister Ed Husic has taken the lead on confronting the fuel firms. This week, talking to the Australian Monetary Overview, he accused them of “behaving identical to huge tech in threatening nations after they don’t like a regulatory response that’s completed within the nationwide financial curiosity”.

Labor’s main items of laws go to 2 of the largest points the federal government faces – actual wages which are a great distance from growing, and vitality payments that can carry on rising. The federal government’s actions will to an extent ameliorate, however received’t clear up these issues.

Wages and vitality will stay dominant points in 2023, persevering with to place a number of strain on the Albanese authorities.The Conversation

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, College of Canberra. This text is republished from The Dialog.

Who could be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s by no means been a extra essential time to assist impartial journalism in Canberra.

Should you belief our work on-line and wish to implement the ability of impartial voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Each greenback of assist is invested again into our journalism to assist preserve sturdy and free.

Develop into a supporter


Ian Meikle, editor